Mathias Bourgue vs Nerman Fatic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 16 Apr at 09:40 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Bourgue vs N. Fatic

FRA
0
Win
Played
1
Win

BIH
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Bourgue 0 - 1 Fatic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mathias Bourgue winning 0 and Nerman Fatic winning 2. The last match between Nerman Fatic and Mathias Bourgue was at the M15 Dubrovnik, 16-04-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Bourgue | 0 |
| Fatic | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Dubrovnik(04-16-25)
M. Bourgue vs N. Fatic H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $143,480 | Career Prize Money | $73,995 |
| 59.09% (481-333) | Career Total W/L | 58.49% (403-286) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 13 | Titles | 12 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
M. Bourgue vs N. Fatic Match Preview:
Over the past year, analysis of both players' performances yields intriguing insights into their form and potential outcomes for the match. Bourgue has won 55.17% of his matches (with a W/L record of 32/26), while Fatic demonstrates a higher match-winning percentage standing at 62.75% (W/L 32/19). This data illustrates a slight advantage for Fatic based on overall victories, providing an overarching head-to-head comparison.
Focusing on second serve performance in the last six months, Bourgue has secured 45.62% of points, marginally exceeding Fatic's 42.16%. This metric often aligns strongly with match predictions, suggesting Bourgue may have a slight edge in maintaining service games.
Return game efficiency is also pivotal, especially on opponents' second serves. Bourgue captures 43.65% of those points, yet Fatic leads here with 47%. For returns on first serves, Bourgue lags behind at 23.57% compared to Fatic's 31.44%. This significant stat indicates Fatic's superiority in return games, influencing match forecasts.
Evaluating their capability under pressure, Bourgue has successfully saved 51.89% of breakpoints, whereas Fatic's save rate is at 43.09%. This facet highlights Bourgue's resilience during critical moments of matches, providing key insights for game predictors.
Exploring their historical performances on different surfaces, both players exhibit their strongest performances on clay courts, with a similar win percentage of 60%. However, Bourgue shows a slightly better adaptability on grass with a win rate of 43% (W/L 3/4) compared to Fatic's struggles, marked by a 0% win rate (W/L 0/2).
Recent play has seen Bourgue contesting mostly in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, with a 68.57% win rate in these $10K events (W/L 24/11). In contrast, Fatic, competing in the same level of tournaments, boasts an impressive win rate of 88% (W/L 22/3), signals higher proficiency in this tier of competitions, potentially pointing to Fatic as a favorite.
Considering opponent quality, Bourgue's adversaries over the last year have had an average rank of 198.74, showcasing tougher competition compared to Fatic's opponents, who averaged a rank of 264.06. This disparity could impact how each player handles the competitiveness of this upcoming matchup.
Performance in deciding sets is relatively comparable, with Bourgue winning 56% of these critical games compared to Fatic's 53% success rate over the same period. Breakpoint conversion reveals a notable difference: Bourgue has converted 23.64% of opportunities, while Fatic has excelled with a 40.35% conversion rate, offering him a key advantage during service breaks.
Taking all statistics into account, Fatic appears to be the marginal favorite, owing largely to his stronger return game statistics and superior performance in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments. However, the match could closely hinge on Bourgue's ability to capitalize under pressure and on his stronger second serve performance.
Mathias Bourgue vs Nerman Fatic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Bourgue vs N. Fatic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 7 | Games Won | 12 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:3:59 | Average Match Time | 2:3:59 |
| 61% (46/76) | 1st Serve % | 61% (46/75) |
| 65% (30/46) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (30/46) |
| 40% (12/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (16/29) |
| 8% (1/12) | Break Pts Won % | 19% (3/16) |
| 39% (29/75) | Return Points Win % | 45% (34/76) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Bourgue Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 7-6(5) 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
SF | L | 6-3 6-7(6) 6-3 | ||
N. Fatic Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(2) ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
QF | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | ||

M. Bourgue vs N. Fatic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.09% (481/333) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.49% (403/286) |
| 56.99% (1076/812) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.51% (888/656) |
| 52.98% (9446/8383) | Games Win/Loss | 53.04% (7574/6706) |
| 60.36% (102/67) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.19% (43/41) |
| 59.46% (264/180) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.00% (341/218) |
| 57.73% (112/82) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43.18% (19/25) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.4 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 3472 | Aces Total | 1568 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1515 | Total Double Faults | 1510 |
| 1:15:1 | Average Match Time | 1:19:52 |
| 554.18 | Average Opponent Rank | 509.74 |
| 63% (27178/43087) | 1st Serve % | 66% (23679/35628) |
| 70% (19068/27178) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (15504/23679) |
| 50% (7996/15909) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (5733/11949) |
| 40% (1632/4061) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1961/4201) |
| 39% (16546/42835) | Return Points Win % | 43% (15552/35990) |
| 44.19% (19/24) | Slam W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 40.00% (4/6) |
| 42.31% (11/15) | Main Tour W/L | 25.00% (3/9) |
| 54.22% (257/217) | Challenger W/L | 52.91% (118/105) |
| 71.75% (193/76) | Futures W/L | 63.24% (277/161) |
| 60% (472/793) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (394/661) |
| 40% (4/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 55% (144/264) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (79/156) |
| 56% (146/261) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (102/188) |
| 88% (450/398) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (393/347) |
| 11% (450/51) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (393/42) |
| 23% (364/82) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (296/57) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Shintaro Mochizuki vs Federico Arnaboldi Prediction – ATP Bergamo Challenger – 18th November 2025 Best Bets

Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
